Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. The largest vendors in low-code platforms
cannot hold places 1 to 3. Places 1 to 3 go to challengers, vendors outside the best-known brands in a category,
wherever the category has them; the established names follow from place 4 in their ranked order. How it works: placement disclosure ·
editorial process.
The 25 tools, reviewed
#1 Thinkwise
Model-driven platform for replacing legacy core systems · Netherlands · thinkwisesoftware.com
Legacy modernisation focus Model-driven, not screen-driven Upcycler migration tooling
Thinkwise, headquartered in Apeldoorn, takes a model-driven approach to a specific, hard problem: replacing a legacy ERP, WMS, TMS, PIM, MES or OMS system a business has outgrown but can't easily walk away from.
- Pricing: Quote only. Not published; quote only. Free plan: none.
- Best for: Large organisations undertaking a multi-year replacement of a business-critical legacy system
- Strengths: Model-driven generation of data model, logic and interface together; Upcycler component for legacy-code migration analysis; AI-assisted modelling.
Where it falls short
No pricing is published anywhere on the vendor's site, so budgeting starts with a sales conversation, and the company discloses its scale only in round figures (over 20 years, about 150 staff, 1,800+ companies, partners and ISVs) rather than a founding date.
Wrong for
A team that wants to ship a small departmental app this week rather than undertake a multi-year, business-critical replacement project.
Visit Thinkwise →
#2 Simplifier
Certified SAP-integrated low-code platform · Germany · simplifier.io
SAP Silver Partner SAP BTP alternative Also on AWS/Azure Marketplace
Simplifier AG, headquartered in Wurzburg since 2012, builds a low-code platform whose core differentiator is certified SAP integration: an SAP Silver Partner and SAP-Certified Business Technology Platform provider, explicitly positioned as an alternative to building directly on SAP's own BTP tooling.
- Pricing: Quote only. Free 30-day trial for development and evaluation; production licences quoted. Free plan: free trial.
- Best for: Companies running a significant SAP estate that want a dedicated low-code layer over it
- Strengths: Certified SAP Business Technology Platform integration; Also a Microsoft Partner, listed on AWS and Azure Marketplace; Workflow automation and enterprise integration tooling.
Where it falls short
No production pricing is published; beyond a free 30-day evaluation trial, every licence starts with a discovery call.
Wrong for
Any organisation without an existing SAP estate, for whom Mendix, Betty Blocks or Ninox offer more general-purpose value.
Visit Simplifier →
SAP-native throughout AI agents deployable in-app EEA-headquartered (Norway)
Neptune Software, headquartered in Oslo, sells Neptune DXP: an SAP-native application development platform built to close what the vendor calls the execution gap between what SAP manages centrally and how work actually happens, letting customers build applications and orchestrate processes directly across SAP and connected systems.
- Pricing: Quote only. Free 30-day trial for two users, non-production; licences quoted. Free plan: free trial.
- Best for: Organisations already running SAP wanting a SAP-native low-code layer rather than building directly on BTP or Fiori
- Strengths: SAP-native application development (Neptune DXP); Multi-step process orchestration across SAP and connected systems; AI agents deployable directly into applications and processes.
Where it falls short
Pricing is entirely quote-only, and no founding date is disclosed on the vendor's pages, which limits independent verification of the company's history.
Wrong for
Any organisation without an existing SAP estate, which gains little from Neptune's SAP-native architecture.
Visit Neptune Software →
#4 Mendix
Model-driven enterprise low-code with real version control · Netherlands · mendix.com
Version control built in Published pricing Siemens-owned
Mendix is a Rotterdam-founded, model-driven low-code platform acquired by Siemens in 2018 and now sold under Siemens' Digital Industries Software portfolio.
- Pricing: Per app + per user, published tiers. Free tier for prototypes. Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Enterprises replacing a core system with a governed, multi-year development process
- Strengths: Model-driven visual development; Branching and merging for application models; On-premises and Kubernetes deployment options.
Where it falls short
Standard pricing is either per application or a much higher Unlimited Apps rate, cloud resource costs come on top of the licence on paid tiers, and the Premium tier most enterprises actually need for high availability is quote-only.
Wrong for
A small team building its first internal application, where the per-application pricing and enterprise-scale governance tooling are more structure than the job needs.
Visit Mendix →
#5 Betty Blocks
No-code platform built against vendor lock-in · Netherlands · bettyblocks.com
Exports standard React/WebAssembly Published pricing Citizen-developer governance
Betty Blocks was founded in Amsterdam in 2007 and built its early reputation on governed citizen development for Dutch insurers and public-sector bodies.
- Pricing: Per month, published tiers. Create EUR1,500/month; Scale EUR3,500/month; Enterprise quoted. Free plan: none.
- Best for: Organisations that have been burned by platform lock-in before, or need formally governed citizen development
- Strengths: Applications compile to standard React and WebAssembly; On-premises hosting on the Enterprise tier; cloud and hybrid deployment otherwise; Governed citizen-development workflow with IT oversight.
Where it falls short
Entry pricing at EUR1,500/month is meaningfully higher than the other Dutch options in this category, positioning it as a mid-market-and-up purchase rather than a small team's first tool.
Wrong for
A small team or solo builder on a tight budget, for whom Mendix's free tier, Baserow's low published pricing or Ninox's per-user model will go further.
Visit Betty Blocks →
#6 Baserow
Open source, self-hostable no-code database · Netherlands · baserow.io
Open source Self-hostable REST API on every tier
Baserow is built and legally operated by Baserow B.V., registered in Amsterdam (KVK 81129254), and is genuinely open source and self-hostable, not merely available on request through a partner.
- Pricing: Open source + per user, published. Free (3,000 rows/workspace). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: A team replacing a shared spreadsheet with something structured, permissioned and queryable, on infrastructure it controls if needed
- Strengths: Open source, self-hostable deployment; REST API and automations from the free tier up; Grid, form and gallery views free; kanban, calendar and timeline on Premium.
Where it falls short
Baserow has added an application builder and automations, but application logic, custom interfaces and workflow depth still trail purpose-built app builders like Mendix or Betty Blocks.
Wrong for
An application that needs deep workflow logic, long multi-step processes or a heavily customized interface beyond what a database-first app builder handles comfortably.
Visit Baserow →
#7 Ninox
German database app builder with its own scripting language · Germany · ninox.com
Genuine free tier German hosting Proprietary scripting language
Ninox is built by Ninox Software GmbH, headquartered in Berlin, founded in 2014.
- Pricing: Per user, published tiers. Free (up to 5 users). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Small German and Swiss firms building back-office databases without developers
- Strengths: Relational tables and forms; Proprietary scripting language for calculated fields and triggers; German-hosted SaaS with private-cloud option.
Where it falls short
The scripting language is proprietary to Ninox and thinly documented in English, so an application built by one person becomes hard for a successor to maintain, and performance is reported to degrade on very large tables.
Wrong for
An application expected to scale past a few hundred thousand records, or one that needs to outlive its original builder without a maintainability plan.
Visit Ninox →
#8 Bubble
No-code builder for real, customer-facing web products · United States · bubble.io
Consumer-facing apps Workload-based pricing No application export
Bubble builds real customer-facing products, marketplaces, portals, subscription tools, and now native iOS and Android apps alongside web apps, and its plugin marketplace fills most integration gaps without custom code.
- Pricing: Monthly tiers with workload allowance, published. Free plan. Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Founders building a customer-facing product without a development team
- Strengths: Full visual web-app builder with a large plugin marketplace; Workflow logic and database included; Responsive design engine.
Where it falls short
Bubble offers no meaningful application export at all: a customer can take its raw data out and nothing else, so leaving the platform means rebuilding the product from scratch.
Wrong for
Anything a company must be able to take to another platform later, or an internal tool where a lighter, cheaper builder like Baserow or Ninox would do the job.
Visit Bubble →
#9 Microsoft Power Apps
Low-code apps over your existing Microsoft 365 data · United States · microsoft.com
Microsoft 365 native Fast to start inside the estate Governance tooling included
Power Apps starts almost free inside an existing Microsoft 365 tenant: identity, permissions and SharePoint or Excel data are already there, so a form replacing a paper process can ship the same morning.
- Pricing: Per user, published. Free Developer Plan for building and testing. Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Microsoft 365 organisations building forms over data they already hold
- Strengths: Native connectors to SharePoint, Excel and Dataverse; Entra ID identity and permissions built in; Admin governance and DLP policy tooling.
Where it falls short
The licensing is the standing complaint in this market: the moment an application touches a premium connector or Dataverse capacity, a per-user charge appears that the original business case rarely accounted for, and performance on large data sets disappoints compared with a purpose-built database platform.
Wrong for
Any organisation outside the Microsoft 365 estate, or one working with data volumes larger than Dataverse handles comfortably.
Visit Microsoft Power Apps →
#10 Appian
Process-first platform for regulated case management · United States · appian.com
Process engine first Case management Full audit trail
Appian is a process engine first and an application builder second, which is why it wins in banking, insurance and government: cases that run for months, rules an auditor can actually read, and a complete record of who approved what.
- Pricing: Per user per app, quote only. Free Community Edition for personal development. Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Regulated case management with audit trails and long-running approvals
- Strengths: Process and case-management engine; Full audit trail for regulated approvals; Low-code + process automation combined.
Where it falls short
The interface is built for correctness and audit trails rather than a pleasant end-user experience, and the per-user price is high for an application meant to reach a wide, casual audience rather than a defined case-handling team.
Wrong for
A simple data-entry application or a wide, casual audience, where Appian's process-engine depth is an expensive answer to a much smaller problem.
Visit Appian →
#11 WEBCON
Process-first platform with live, in-flight process changes · Poland · webcon.com
InstantChange live process editing ERP and Microsoft integration Process-first, not app-first
WEBCON, headquartered in Krakow, sells what it calls the WEBCON BPS (Business Process Suite) Platform, and it is explicit about sitting at the process-automation end of this category, closer to Appian than to a general-purpose builder like Mendix.
- Pricing: Quote only. No prices published. Free plan: free trial.
- Best for: Process-centric approvals, HR and document workflows on an existing ERP or Microsoft estate
- Strengths: InstantChange: modify a live process without redeploying or breaking in-flight instances; Deep integration with existing ERP systems and Microsoft 365; Financial, HR, manufacturing and document-heavy process applications.
Where it falls short
No prices are published anywhere, only the licensing structure, and no founding date is disclosed on the pages checked; the SaaS service is stated as ISO 27001 certified.
Wrong for
A team wanting to build a standalone customer-facing product rather than automate an internal, process-centric workflow.
Visit WEBCON →
#12 NocoDB
Self-deployable no-code database with an Airtable importer · United States · nocodb.com
Self-deployable Fair-code licence Seat bundle pricing
NocoDB's pricing page offers a free Community edition for self-deployment, a cloud Free plan for up to 3 users and 1,000 records, and Plus and Business plans that sell either per seat or as an unlimited-seat bundle after nine paid users.
- Pricing: Free self-hosted + per seat or seat bundle, published. Community free, self-deployed. Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: A team that wants an Airtable-style database it can run itself or buy as a seat bundle
- Strengths: Grid, kanban, gallery, form, calendar and map views; Docs alongside tables; Airtable base import from a shared base or view.
Where it falls short
The Airtable importer does not bring in Formula fields at this time and turns linked records into plain text when it reads a shared view.
Wrong for
A team that needs formulas imported as live formulas from Airtable, or a licence that the OSI approves.
Visit NocoDB →
#13 Grist
Relational spreadsheet with Python formulas · United States · getgrist.com
Python formulas Apache-2.0 core Record limit per document
Grist Labs says it is headquartered in New York City with a distributed team, and the core repository is Apache-2.0.
- Pricing: Per user, published tiers + free self-hosted core. Free (5,000 records per document). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: A team whose bases behave like spreadsheets and who want formulas, layouts and self-hosting
- Strengths: Python formulas with Excel-style functions; Reference columns and linked layouts; Migration tool for Airtable bases.
Where it falls short
Limits count per document, so a data set above 150,000 records in one document has no published tier, and the Enterprise limit is not stated on the page.
Wrong for
A team that needs one database with hundreds of thousands of records in a single document, or a ready-made form and portal experience for outside users.
Visit Grist →
#14 SeaTable
No-code database, cloud or on-premises · Germany · seatable.com
On-premises Server edition Per-team row caps Metered scripts and API
The SeaTable imprint names SeaTable GmbH at 117er Ehrenhof 5 in Mainz, and the prices page shows Cloud and on-premises editions with the same feature set on Server. Rows are limited per team and per base.
- Pricing: Per user, published tiers. Free (up to 25 users, 10,000 rows). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: A team that needs a hosted or on-premises no-code database with SAML or LDAP sign-in
- Strengths: 26 column types with filters, grouping and views; JavaScript and Python scripting; Web forms and app builder.
Where it falls short
The Free plan fixes Python script runs at 100 and API calls at 3,000 a month, whatever the number of users.
Wrong for
A team with a single base well beyond 100,000 rows, outside the Dedicated tier, where a dedicated database or a larger plan is needed.
Visit SeaTable →
#15 Knack
No-code database apps with unlimited users · United States · knack.com
Unlimited users Record-based pricing Customer portals
Knack's terms name Evenly Odd, Inc. (doing business as Knack), governed by Pennsylvania law.
- Pricing: Monthly tiers by record volume, published. Starter $59/month ($49 annual). Free plan: free trial.
- Best for: A team that publishes data to many customers, vendors or volunteers without paying per user
- Strengths: Online relational database; Front-end web app designer; Knack Flows and API for automation and integration.
Where it falls short
No standing free plan is listed on the page, only a free trial.
Wrong for
A team that wants a standing free tier or a team-internal tracker where per-user billing would be cheaper.
Visit Knack →
#16 Zoho Creator
Low-code app platform in the Zoho family · India · zoho.com
Zoho ecosystem Customer portal add-on Native mobile apps
Zoho Creator's pricing page lists Standard, Professional, Enterprise and a custom Flex plan, a free edition that starts with one custom app, and a 15-day trial of all features. Customer-portal users are a separate add-on sold in blocks.
- Pricing: Per user, tiers. Free edition and 15-day trial. Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: A team already using Zoho products that wants apps and portals for staff and outside users
- Strengths: Forms, reports, pages and workflows as building blocks; Generated native iOS and Android apps; Customer portal add-on.
Where it falls short
The plan prices are not present in the server-rendered pricing page, so cost cannot be read without opening the page in a browser.
Wrong for
A team that wants a spreadsheet-style grid it can start in minutes, or one that avoids add-on charges for outside users.
Visit Zoho Creator →
#17 Stackby
Spreadsheet-style database with API connectors · India · stackby.com
API connectors Read-only guests free Per-stack limits
Stackby's about page says the founder moved to India in 2018 to start it, and the site credits Relytree Technologies Private Limited and Relytree Inc. Plans are published and limits count per stack: 1,500 rows on Free, 7,000 on Economy, 50,000 on Business and 100,000 on Pro, with unlimited read-only guests on paid plans.
- Pricing: Per seat, published tiers. Free (5 editors). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: A team with a few editors and many read-only guests that wants an Airtable-style grid at lower seat prices
- Strengths: Spreadsheet-style tables with interface designer; API column connectors to other services; Internal automations and powerups.
Where it falls short
Row limits per stack are smaller than Airtable's record caps at the same tier, and portals are an extra charge per ten guests.
Wrong for
A team whose single table needs hundreds of thousands of rows or that needs a published portal included in the plan.
Visit Stackby →
#18 Fibery
Connected workspace of databases and documents · United States · fibery.io
Free observers and guests Docs and databases together Prices in EUR
Fibery's privacy policy names Fibery, Inc. and Fibery Limited, its security page calls it a U.S. company, and the terms are governed by the laws of Cyprus.
- Pricing: Per user, published tiers. Free (10 users, 10 databases). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: A product or agency team that wants databases, documents and whiteboards in one workspace
- Strengths: Databases with relations across spaces; Documents, whiteboards and feeds; Table, board, calendar, timeline and Gantt views.
Where it falls short
The Free plan stops at 10 users and 10 databases and keeps 14 days of version history.
Wrong for
A team that just wants a flat table of records with forms, or that needs a bounded grid larger than 10 databases on Free.
Visit Fibery →
#19 Airtable
Relational database with interfaces and automations · United States · airtable.com
Interface Designer Per-base record caps Per-collaborator billing
Airtable, whose privacy policy gives an address at 1 Front Street, San Francisco, sells hosted relational bases with an interface layer on top.
- Pricing: Per user, published tiers. Free (1,000 records per base). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Teams that want shared tables, forms, interface pages and automations in one hosted workspace
- Strengths: Relational tables with grid, calendar, timeline and Gantt views; Interface Designer pages and forms; Automations and scripting.
Where it falls short
Billing is per collaborator, and on Team commenters count as billable.
Wrong for
A team with large record counts across few editors who cannot accept a hard cap per base, or one that signs up with webmail addresses and needs Business.
Visit Airtable →
#20 Retool
Internal-tool builder that charges by builder and user · United States · retool.com
Per builder and user Cloud, self-hosted on Enterprise Git source control
Retool bills three classes of user and gates SSO, Git source control and self-hosting behind Enterprise. That is the pattern buyers meet when they compare it with Appsmith or ToolJet, which publish per-builder or flat per-user prices.
- Pricing: Per builder + per user, published tiers. Free (up to 5 users). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Engineering teams building admin panels and workflows on top of their own databases and APIs
- Strengths: Free, Team and Business on Retool Cloud; Enterprise on Retool Cloud, self-hosted or air-gapped; Builders and internal users priced separately; external users metered from Business.
Where it falls short
The cost scales with the number of employees who open apps, and the pricing page lists SSO, SCIM, 2FA and Git source control as not included below Enterprise.
Wrong for
A company with a large number of occasional viewers and a tight per-seat budget, or one that needs SSO and self-hosting but not Enterprise pricing.
Visit Retool →
#21 Appsmith
Open-source builder for admin panels and dashboards · United States · appsmith.com
Open source Git versioning Per user
Appsmith has the least complicated price among the tools added later: $15 per user a month on Business, with no builder and viewer split. Its source is public under Apache-2.0, and Git versioning is on every plan.
- Pricing: Open source + per user, published. Free (up to 5 users on cloud). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Developers who want an Apache-2.0 internal-tool builder with Git versioning
- Strengths: Apache-2.0 community edition; Git version control, 3 repos on Free, unlimited on Business; Workflows and reusable packages from Business.
Where it falls short
Free is limited to 5 cloud users and 3 repos, and Business stops at 99 users, so a company moves to a $2,500-a-month Enterprise plan quickly.
Wrong for
A large company needing SSO and SCIM that wants to pay per builder instead of per user, or a buyer who needs a city-level headquarters stated.
Visit Appsmith →
#22 Budibase
Low-code apps, automations and agents, cloud or self-hosted · United Kingdom · budibase.com
Open source Self-hostable Creators and end users priced separately
Budibase is a Belfast-incorporated builder with a free self-hosted edition and cloud plans that start at $19 a month. Its pricing counts creators and automation actions, with end users as a $5 add-on and extra creators at $50 a month.
- Pricing: Open source + monthly tiers, published. Open source self-hosted free (1 workspace, unlimited users). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Teams that want to self-host for free with unlimited users, or pay a small cloud fee per creator
- Strengths: Self-hosted open-source edition with unlimited apps and users; Cloud tiers with action quotas (5K, 20K, 250K per month); Automation builder and AI agent builder.
Where it falls short
Cloud plans each include one creator and a monthly action quota, so heavy automation or many viewers raises the bill.
Wrong for
A team that wants hundreds of cheap viewers on a managed cloud plan, or one that needs several workspaces on the free tier.
Visit Budibase →
#23 ToolJet
Open-source internal-tool and workflow builder · United States · tooljet.com
AGPL-3.0 Per builder Self-hostable
ToolJet is priced per builder, so viewers do not add seats until the end-user caps of 50 or 100 are reached.
- Pricing: Per builder, published; AGPL-3.0 self-hosted. Free ($0/builder, 2 builders, 50 end users, 10 apps). Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Teams with a few builders and many viewers that want an AGPL-3.0 builder to host themselves
- Strengths: Cloud and self-hosted editions; 80+ components and custom React components; Built-in ToolJet Database on PostgreSQL.
Where it falls short
End users are capped at 50 on Free, Basic and Pro and 100 on Team, with unlimited only on Enterprise.
Wrong for
A company with several hundred occasional users and no Enterprise budget, or a buyer who objects to the AGPL licence.
Visit ToolJet →
#24 Superblocks
AI-built internal apps with enterprise governance · United States · superblocks.com
AI agent builder Unlimited end users VPC deployment
Superblocks prices a base fee for up to 15 builders plus $10 for each extra hosted app, with unlimited end users. The pricing page presents it as an AI vibe-coding platform governed by IT, with VPC deployment on Enterprise.
- Pricing: Per hosted app + base fee, published. Teams $125/month monthly or $100/month annual (up to 15 builders, 1 hosted app, then $10 per extra app/month). Free plan: none.
- Best for: IT-led teams letting business users build apps in a governed VPC
- Strengths: Clark AI agent for building apps; Staging and production environments, 50+ integrations; Unlimited end users.
Where it falls short
Teams has no SSO, RBAC, audit logs or source control; those are Enterprise.
Wrong for
A team wanting to hand-code queries on a free plan, or to self-host without an Enterprise contract or a trial that ends.
Visit Superblocks →
#25 UI Bakery
Low-code builder priced per developer only · United States · uibakery.io
Per developer Cloud or self-hosted Hosted database
UI Bakery counts only developers, and viewers are not priced until the Enterprise band of 50 workspace view seats. The Free plan allows unlimited apps and data sources plus a hosted database.
- Pricing: Per developer, published. Cloud Free $0. Free plan: free plan.
- Best for: Teams that want to pay only for editors, with a free self-hosted plan
- Strengths: Unlimited apps and data source connections on Free; Unlimited public app users; Free hosted PostgreSQL database.
Where it falls short
Builder allows up to 50 workspace view seats, and beyond that a buyer moves to Enterprise. AI usage is metered through credits.
Wrong for
An organisation that needs SSO below Enterprise, since custom SSO is Enterprise only, or one with a large viewer base.
Visit UI Bakery →
