Skip to content
Graph databases · 11 alternatives

Neo4j alternatives: 11 compared

Teams look past Neo4j when the hourly per-gigabyte Aura billing is hard to forecast, when backup and clustering features of the self-managed server sit in Enterprise editions priced only through sales, or when they want another query language or hosting model. Most go to Memgraph, FalkorDB or TigerGraph, or to a cloud-native graph service.

Short answer: The closest replacements for Neo4j in our graph databases ranking are JanusGraph, NebulaGraph and Memgraph. Choose JanusGraph if you want a permissively licensed engine and your team can run the storage backend. All 11 alternatives below are ranked products from Best Graph Database Software in 2026, and each says where it differs from Neo4j and when Neo4j is still the better choice.

Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. Every vendor link is marked the same, whatever the arrangement behind it. The first three alternatives go to challengers, vendors outside the best-known brands in a category, wherever the category has them; the established names follow in their ranked order. How it works: placement disclosure · editorial process.

Neo4j at a glance

  • Headquarters: United States
  • Pricing model: Usage-based
  • Pricing: AuraDB Free is $0; Professional starts at $0.09 per GB per hour with a 1 GB minimum; Business Critical starts at $0.20 per GB per hour with a 2 GB minimum.
  • Free option: Free plan
  • Built for: Teams that value ecosystem and hiring pool
  • Wrong for: Cost-sensitive teams with small graphs, or buyers that want one SQL-plus-graph store. Memgraph or FalkorDB cost less to run, and PuppyGraph avoids copying the data.
  • Place in our ranking: #4 of 12
  • Website: neo4j.com

Facts from our graph databases ranking, last checked November 3, 2026.

Why buyers look past Neo4j

  1. Aura is billed by the gigabyte hour

    AuraDB Professional starts at 0.09 dollars per GB per hour with a 1 GB minimum, and Business Critical at 0.20 dollars with a 2 GB minimum. The bill follows memory and time, so a larger instance left running costs more every hour. Forecasting needs a sizing decision first.

  2. Enterprise features carry no public price

    Neo4j documents online backup, backup chain aggregation, restore and database copy as Enterprise features of the self-managed server. The pricing page prints no figure for Enterprise or Infinigraph, so the cost of a production backup routine is learned only through a sales conversation.

  3. Limits on the lower tiers

    AuraDB Free caps nodes and relationships and offers community support only. Professional runs single-zone with seven days of daily backups and goes up to 128 GB of memory per instance. The multi-zone 99.95 percent SLA, 30-day backups and SSO start on Business Critical.

11 alternatives at a glance

Closest replacement first. The last column is our place in the full 12-product ranking.

#AlternativeHeadquartersPricingKey differenceSwitch ifOur rank
1JanusGraphUnited StatesOpen source; open sourceOpen-source distributed graph database on pluggable storage backendsyou want a permissively licensed engine and your team can run the storage backend#12
2NebulaGraphUnited StatesOpen source + paid tiers; open sourceDistributed open-source graph database with an enterprise and cloud editionyou want to try a managed graph service for two weeks without entering a card#10
3MemgraphUnited KingdomOpen source + paid tiers; open sourceIn-memory graph database with Cypher and open Community Editionyou want to keep Cypher and get replication in the free edition#1
4FalkorDBUnited StatesPer instance / month; free planLow-latency graph database aimed at GraphRAG and multi-tenant appsyou want OpenCypher and a graph you can start on a laptop in one command#2
5PuppyGraphUnited StatesQuote only; free planZero-ETL graph query engine over your existing data storesyour data already lives in a warehouse or database and you do not want a second copy#7
6AllegroGraphUnited StatesQuote only; free planDistributed RDF graph and document database with a natural-language agentyour model is RDF and you need SPARQL and reasoning rather than property graph queries#11
7GraphDBAustriaQuote only; free planRDF and SPARQL database with reasoning, from Graphwiseyou work with knowledge graphs and ontologies and want standards-based reasoning#9
8StardogUnited StatesQuote only; free planEnterprise knowledge graph platform with virtual graphs and inferenceyou want a commercial knowledge graph platform and can live without backups in the free tier#8
9TigerGraphUnited StatesUsage-based; free planDistributed graph platform with GSQL, Cypher and hybrid graph and vector searchyou want a managed service with European regions and a free single-server edition for testing#3
10Amazon NeptuneUnited StatesUsage-based; noneAWS-managed graph database with serverless and analytics optionsyour workloads already run on AWS and you want one invoice and one provider#5
11Azure Cosmos DB for Apache GremlinUnited StatesUsage-based; free planGremlin graph API on Microsoft's managed multi-model databaseyou run on Azure, accept Gremlin and want to pick the consistency level per workload#6

What each alternative does differently

1. JanusGraph

Open-source distributed graph database on pluggable storage backends · United States

An Apache 2.0 project under the Linux Foundation, queried with Gremlin rather than Cypher. It stores data in Cassandra, HBase, Bigtable, BerkeleyDB or ScyllaDB and indexes with Elasticsearch, Solr or Lucene. You assemble and operate those parts yourself, so there is no vendor managed service.

Switch from Neo4j if you want a permissively licensed engine and your team can run the storage backend.

Pricing: Free under the Apache 2.0 license; you pay for the servers, storage backend and the engineers who run them. (open source)

Full review: #12 of 12 in our ranking · Visit JanusGraph →

2. NebulaGraph

Distributed open-source graph database with an enterprise and cloud edition · United States

An open-source edition sits beside an Enterprise edition and a managed cloud service. The cloud service offers a 14-day trial without a credit card. Its home page prints no price for Enterprise or Cloud, and the licence and query language were not stated there, so check both before committing.

Switch from Neo4j if you want to try a managed graph service for two weeks without entering a card.

Pricing: Open-source edition, an Enterprise edition by quote, and NebulaGraph Cloud pay as you go with a 14-day free trial and no credit card. (open source)

Full review: #10 of 12 in our ranking · Visit NebulaGraph →

3. Memgraph

In-memory graph database with Cypher and open Community Edition · United Kingdom

An in-memory engine that speaks Cypher, so many Neo4j queries carry over. The free Community Edition includes vector search, the MAGE algorithm library and high-availability replication. Pricing scales with memory, with no per-query charges. Cloud instances span 1 to 32 GB across six AWS regions.

Switch from Neo4j if you want to keep Cypher and get replication in the free edition.

Pricing: Community Edition is free and open source; Enterprise and Cloud are priced on memory with the figure given by sales, and Cloud offers a free trial. (open source)

Full review: #1 of 12 in our ranking · Visit Memgraph →

4. FalkorDB

Low-latency graph database aimed at GraphRAG and multi-tenant apps · United States

Open source, built on OpenCypher, and started locally with one Docker command. The Free plan prints no limits but has no TLS or clustering. Clustering, high availability and continuous persistence begin on the Pro plan. Sized in single-gigabyte steps, it fits small graphs behind an application.

Switch from Neo4j if you want OpenCypher and a graph you can start on a laptop in one command.

Pricing: Free plan with community support; Startup from $73 per 1 GB per month, Pro from $350 per 8 GB per month, Enterprise on request. (free plan)

Full review: #2 of 12 in our ranking · Visit FalkorDB →

5. PuppyGraph

Zero-ETL graph query engine over your existing data stores · United States

A graph query layer that reads your existing data sources instead of copying them into a separate store. The Developer Edition is a single Docker node limited to two data sources. Enterprise adds unlimited sources, clustering, Datadog integration and SSO, priced on server memory and CPU with no storage fees.

Switch from Neo4j if your data already lives in a warehouse or database and you do not want a second copy.

Pricing: Developer Edition is free and single node; Enterprise has a 30-day trial and pricing on server memory and CPU, with no storage or data-volume fees. (free plan)

Full review: #7 of 12 in our ranking · Visit PuppyGraph →

6. AllegroGraph

Distributed RDF graph and document database with a natural-language agent · United States

A triple store for semantic data: SPARQL 1.2, RDF-star, OWL 2 RL, SHACL and Prolog rules, described as fully ACID. It runs on premise, in Docker, or as AllegroGraph.cloud via the AWS and Azure marketplaces. No prices are printed, and a purchase page sends you to the vendor.

Switch from Neo4j if your model is RDF and you need SPARQL and reasoning rather than property graph queries.

Pricing: A free edition is offered; paid licenses are sold through a purchase process and cloud options, with prices not published. (free plan)

Full review: #11 of 12 in our ranking · Visit AllegroGraph →

7. GraphDB

RDF and SPARQL database with reasoning, from Graphwise · Austria

An RDF database from Graphwise, compliant with RDF 1.1 and SPARQL 1.1 with RDF-star, and supporting RDFS, OWL 2 RL and OWL 2 QL reasoning. A Free edition runs on a single-core license, which since version 11 must be requested. Enterprise comes as a 12-core cluster on AWS and Azure marketplaces.

Switch from Neo4j if you work with knowledge graphs and ontologies and want standards-based reasoning.

Pricing: GraphDB Free is available; Enterprise is priced by sales ('call us for custom pricing'). (free plan)

Full review: #9 of 12 in our ranking · Visit GraphDB →

8. Stardog

Enterprise knowledge graph platform with virtual graphs and inference · United States

A knowledge graph platform with a no-cost, renewable one-year Free license that is not open source and is allowed for commercial use. Free leaves out high availability, caching, backups, LDAP and the full connector range. Enterprise, on premise or cloud, is quoted after a sales call.

Switch from Neo4j if you want a commercial knowledge graph platform and can live without backups in the free tier.

Pricing: Stardog Free has no commercial limitations; Enterprise licenses, including high availability and support, are quoted by sales. (free plan)

Full review: #8 of 12 in our ranking · Visit Stardog →

9. TigerGraph

Distributed graph platform with GSQL, Cypher and hybrid graph and vector search · United States

Queried in GSQL, with Cypher and GQL also supported. The free Community Edition is a single-server download holding up to 300 GB of graph and vector data. Savanna, the managed cloud, offers regions in London, Dublin and Frankfurt at a price factor of 1.125 against 1.00 for the US.

Switch from Neo4j if you want a managed service with European regions and a free single-server edition for testing.

Pricing: Savanna starts with a free tier, then lists $45 per GB per month and $126 per GB per month for business critical; storage is $0.025 per GB per month. (free plan)

Full review: #3 of 12 in our ranking · Visit TigerGraph →

10. Amazon Neptune

AWS-managed graph database with serverless and analytics options · United States

An AWS service billed per instance hour, per gigabyte of storage and for data transfer, with per-request I/O charges on the Standard tier. A 30-day Free Tier covers a new first cluster. It lives inside AWS only, so it suits teams that already run their workloads there.

Switch from Neo4j if your workloads already run on AWS and you want one invoice and one provider.

Pricing: Pay per instance hour, storage, I/O and transfer; its own example prices a db.r5.large at $0.348 per hour and storage at $0.10 per GB-month. (none)

Full review: #5 of 12 in our ranking · Visit Amazon Neptune →

11. Azure Cosmos DB for Apache Gremlin

Gremlin graph API on Microsoft's managed multi-model database · United States

Built on Apache TinkerPop and queried with Gremlin, with five tunable consistency levels. Microsoft's own introduction points analytical graph workloads and Gremlin migrations to Graph in Microsoft Fabric, and high-scale workloads to Cosmos DB for NoSQL. Read that guidance before choosing it for a new project.

Switch from Neo4j if you run on Azure, accept Gremlin and want to pick the consistency level per workload.

Pricing: Billed in request units with provisioned, autoscale or serverless options, plus storage; new accounts can enable a free tier of 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB. (free plan)

Full review: #6 of 12 in our ranking · Visit Azure Cosmos DB for Apache Gremlin →

When Neo4j is still the right choice

Neo4j remains the sensible choice when your team already writes Cypher and wants a managed service on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud with a free tier to start. It also fits when you need a community edition under GPL3 for self-hosting, or the Graph Data Science library, with the community edition limited to four CPU cores. Rewriting working queries costs more than most price gaps.

What to expect when you switch from Neo4j

  1. Check the query language first

    Memgraph, FalkorDB and TigerGraph state support for Cypher or OpenCypher, which keeps much of a Neo4j codebase. JanusGraph and Cosmos DB use Gremlin, and the RDF stores use SPARQL. Moving to those means rewriting queries, so count the queries before you pick.

  2. Plan the data export

    Neo4j documents database dump restore in Community Edition and online backup in Enterprise. We could not confirm which export formats suit loading into another engine, so test an export against the target before cancelling any Aura or Enterprise subscription.

  3. Run both in parallel

    Keep Neo4j running while the target engine handles a copy of real traffic. Because Aura bills by the hour, you can stop the old instance as soon as results match. Self-managed Enterprise contracts are quoted, so ask for the notice period in writing.

Questions and answers

Is there a free Neo4j alternative?

Yes, several. Memgraph Community Edition is free and open source, JanusGraph is Apache 2.0, and FalkorDB and TigerGraph publish free editions. Free tiers differ in limits, so compare high availability, backups and support before moving production data.

Which Neo4j alternative uses Cypher?

Memgraph uses Cypher, FalkorDB uses OpenCypher, and TigerGraph Community Edition supports Cypher and GQL next to GSQL. These keep the most existing Neo4j queries. JanusGraph and Cosmos DB use Gremlin, so they need rewrites.

Can I self-host instead of using Neo4j Aura?

Yes, Neo4j itself offers Community Edition under GPL3 for self-hosting, and Memgraph, JanusGraph and FalkorDB can also be run on your own servers. Self-hosting trades the hourly Aura bill for the work of operating and backing up the database.

How much does Neo4j cost at scale?

Aura Professional starts at 0.09 dollars per GB per hour and Business Critical at 0.20 dollars per GB per hour. Enterprise and Infinigraph carry no published price, so large deployments need a sales quote from Neo4j.

Which graph database fits RDF and SPARQL?

AllegroGraph, GraphDB and Stardog work with RDF and semantic data. AllegroGraph and GraphDB list SPARQL and reasoning support. Neo4j is a property graph database, so moving to an RDF store changes the data model, not only the vendor.

What happens to my Neo4j backups when I leave?

Neo4j Business Critical keeps daily backups for 30 days with hourly point-in-time restore. Download or export what you need before closing the instance, because the retention window belongs to the subscription. Confirm the export format against your target first.

Sources

Prices, plan limits and product facts about Neo4j on this page were checked against the vendors' own pages on November 3, 2026. Vendors change both without notice, so treat the figures as of that date.

Who wrote this

Sebastiaan Smits Sebastiaan Smits, Founder, wrote, edited and fact-checked this page. Founder of The Interregnum and of 2 Steps Ahead, an AI search visibility agency. Editorially responsible for every page here; research and drafting are AI-assisted. Last reviewed November 3, 2026. How we review.