Editor Sebastiaan Smits ·
Published October 30, 2026 · Updated October 30, 2026
Buyers look past Informatica when they only need pipelines into a warehouse and do not want a quote-only suite sold in consumption units. Most go to Matillion for visual transformation, Boomi for a comparable integration platform, or Airbyte for published prices and a self-hosted option.
Short answer: The closest replacements for Informatica in our ETL and data integration tools ranking are Matillion, Boomi and Airbyte. Choose Matillion if your Informatica work is mostly warehouse loads and transformations that a SQL-literate team could build visually. Each of the 11 options is a ranked entry in Best ETL Tools in 2026; the notes explain how it differs from Informatica and where Informatica still wins.
Visibility in our rankings can be paid for. Payment moves a vendor's position within the shortlist; it never adds a vendor, and it never changes a word of the review or of this page. The first three alternatives go to challengers, vendors outside the best-known brands in a category, wherever the category has them; the established names follow in their ranked order. How it works: placement disclosure · editorial process.
Informatica's pricing page describes consumption in Informatica Pricing Units and ends in a get-quote button. It says a sample price range is available for your use case, but prints no figure. A team that wants to compare three vendors in a week has nothing to put in a spreadsheet.
The page says IPU consumption is calculated per scaler, such as the Secure Agent or mass-ingestion volume, with details in a separate Measurement Guide. Usage shows in a dashboard with threshold alerts. Forecasting a year of spend therefore means reading that guide first.
Informatica's site carries a Salesforce copyright line and an 'Informatica from Salesforce' menu entry. Customers outside the Salesforce ecosystem may want a vendor whose roadmap is not tied to a CRM owner, or simply want to reopen a contract after an ownership change.
These 11 are sorted by suitability as a Informatica replacement, and the final column gives their position in our 12-product list.
| # | Alternative | Headquarters | Switch if | Our rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Matillion | United Kingdom | your Informatica work is mostly warehouse loads and transformations that a SQL-literate team could build visually | #3 |
| 2 |  Boomi | United States | you still need application and API integration next to data loads and accept a quote-based purchase | #10 |
| 3 |  Airbyte | United States | you want printed prices, a 14-day no-card trial and the option to run the engine on your own servers | #1 |
| 4 |  Keboola | Czech Republic | you want one platform with a catalog and transformations, and a supplier based in Europe | #5 |
| 5 |  SnapLogic | United States | you want a visual integration builder with a flat-looking package model instead of metered units | #11 |
| 6 |  Hevo | United States | your sources are standard SaaS and database feeds and nobody wants to administer a platform | #2 |
| 7 |  Azure Data Factory | United States | your warehouse and storage already live in Azure and your engineers prefer code and designers to a licensed suite | #7 |
| 8 |  AWS Glue | United States | your data sits in S3, your engineers write Spark or Python, and you want to pay only for job time | #8 |
| 9 |  Skyvia | Slovakia | your Informatica use shrank to a few simple syncs between a CRM, a database and a warehouse | #6 |
| 10 |  Fivetran | United States | you need many managed SaaS connectors and are willing to learn a row-based meter in exchange | #4 |
| 11 |  Portable | United States | you want a stable monthly figure regardless of volume and your sources include obscure applications | #9 |
Closest in spirit for analytics teams: pipelines are drawn on a low-code canvas with SQL and Python components, and the transformation runs in your own warehouse. Editions are Developer (one developer user), Teams and Scale (five). It has no master data or governance modules, and the pricing page prints no credit rate.
Switch from Informatica if your Informatica work is mostly warehouse loads and transformations that a SQL-literate team could build visually.
The nearest like-for-like swap if Informatica ran application flows as well as data loads. Boomi's data integration page lists four editions from Base to Enterprise, all marked talk to sales, and its Base edition includes two users and unlimited connections. Expect a sales process similar to the one you are leaving.
Switch from Informatica if you still need application and API integration next to data loads and accept a quote-based purchase.
Starts at $20 a month with 5 credits, and Plus at $189 for 40 credits with 15-minute syncs, both on the pricing page. The open-source engine is free to self-host. It lists 700+ connectors and CDC, but has no master data, catalog or governance suite, so those stay elsewhere.
Switch from Informatica if you want printed prices, a 14-day no-card trial and the option to run the engine on your own servers.
One Prague-based platform covering extraction, SQL, Python and R transformation, a flow builder and a data catalog. The free tier gives 120 compute minutes in month one and 60 afterward, extra minutes at $0.14. Dev and prod modes, Git CI/CD and SOX sit in the quoted Enterprise tier.
Switch from Informatica if you want one platform with a catalog and transformations, and a supplier based in Europe.
Another enterprise platform sold by quote, in Essential, Professional and Enterprise One packages, with a visual builder of prebuilt Snaps. Its pricing page says pipelines and data movement are unlimited for the same price. It replaces the integration half of Informatica, not its data quality or master data products.
Switch from Informatica if you want a visual integration builder with a flat-looking package model instead of metered units.
A managed ELT service with no engineering needed: free plan up to 1M events a month, Starter from $265 a month on annual billing with 170+ connectors and dbt integration. Its pricing page also offers a contract-buyout check for buyers locked into another ETL contract. Streaming pipelines and SSO need the quoted tier.
Switch from Informatica if your sources are standard SaaS and database feeds and nobody wants to administer a platform.
Microsoft's pay-as-you-go service for orchestration and copy activity, with separate meters for runs, data movement in DIU-hours and pipeline hours. There is no suite around it: quality, catalog and master data would come from other Azure products. The price table did not render for us, so we quote no figures.
Switch from Informatica if your warehouse and storage already live in Azure and your engineers prefer code and designers to a licensed suite.
Serverless Spark jobs billed per DPU-hour, with a pricing-page example of 6 DPUs for 15 minutes costing $0.66. The Data Catalog is free for the first million objects and accesses. Connectors to SaaS apps are mostly your own work, and no commercial support tier or governance suite is bundled.
Switch from Informatica if your data sits in S3, your engineers write Spark or Python, and you want to pay only for job time.
Browser-based service from Devart with a printed ladder: free at 10k records a month, then $99, $199 and $499 (20% off annually), unlimited users on every tier. Free and Basic run once a day, Professional once a minute. Its scope is small and mid-size loads, not an enterprise estate.
Switch from Informatica if your Informatica use shrank to a few simple syncs between a CRM, a database and a warehouse.
Moves data into your warehouse with 700+ managed connectors and 15-minute syncs on Standard, plus a free plan up to 500,000 monthly active rows. Billing counts active rows per connection, which differs from IPU scalers. It has no master data or governance products, and its own dbt Labs tie-up is recent.
Switch from Informatica if you need many managed SaaS connectors and are willing to learn a row-based meter in exchange.
A fixed monthly fee by number of enabled flows: $1,800 for 6, $2,800 for 15, $4,200 for 25, Enterprise from $7,000, all with unlimited data volume. The 14-day trial is its only free option. It suits long-tail sources, and bespoke connector work is a separate $2,000 add-on on Standard.
Switch from Informatica if you want a stable monthly figure regardless of volume and your sources include obscure applications.
Stay with Informatica when integration is one strand of a wider program that also covers data quality, master data, a catalog and privacy, and you want those under one contract. Its pricing page describes spending that can move between services as needs change, and a dashboard with alerts. A buyer who already uses most of those modules would be replacing them one by one.
Informatica's units cover many services, so list which ones your team runs: mappings, application integration, data quality, catalog. Alternatives here replace the loading and integration part. Quality rules, master data and cataloging need their own answer, and may be the reason to stay for a while.
We found no statement on Informatica's pages about exporting mappings into another vendor's format, so assume each pipeline is recreated by hand in the new tool. Run the new pipeline beside the old one for a full billing cycle, compare row counts, then ask for the end-of-contract date in writing.
Informatica does not publish a price. Its pricing page describes volume-based consumption in Informatica Pricing Units and offers a get-quote button and a sample price range for your use case. Any figure you read elsewhere is not from the vendor, so we quote none.
Yes, its iPaaS page advertises a free 30-day cloud trial, and the site menu also lists a free cloud data integration option. We did not verify the usage limits of either, so confirm them before you plan a proof of concept around them.
Salesforce. The footer of Informatica's website reads as a Salesforce, Inc. copyright, and the navigation includes an 'Informatica from Salesforce' entry. Check your own contract for which legal entity you are bound to and whether the acquisition changes your renewal terms.
Per scaler, according to the pricing page. A scaler is a usage measure such as the Secure Agent or data mass ingestion volume, and the Informatica Measurement Guide explains each one. Administrators can set threshold alerts, which is the main way to see overspend before the invoice.
Rarely a single one. Boomi and SnapLogic cover data and application integration, and Keboola adds a catalog, but none of the eleven alternatives here lists master data management. Most migrations replace the integration layer first and decide about quality and master data later.
Airbyte, Hevo, Skyvia, Portable, Fivetran and Keboola print at least part of their prices. Matillion, Boomi and SnapLogic send you to sales for figures, as Informatica does. Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue are metered, with Glue's $0.44 per DPU-hour visible on its page.
Figures for Informatica and the alternatives come from the vendors' public pages, read on October 30, 2026. Treat them as a snapshot; rates and caps get revised often.
Sebastiaan Smits, Founder, wrote, edited and fact-checked this page.
Founder of The Interregnum and of 2 Steps Ahead, an AI search visibility agency. Editorially responsible for every page here; research and drafting are AI-assisted. Last reviewed October 30, 2026.
How we review.